Impact of Team Relationship Differentiation on Team Creativity: A Qualitative Research with Psychological Safety in the Team as a Mediator: Impact of team relationship differentiation on team creativity

Lan Jing; Krisada Chienwattanasook

doi:10.22122/ijbmc.v11i2.642

Authors

Lan Jing
jing_l@mail.rmutt.ac.th
School of Business Administration, Rajamangala University of Technology, Thanyaburi, Pathum Thani, Thailand, Thailand
Krisada Chienwattanasook Department of Management, School of Business Administration, Rajamangala University of Technology, Thanyaburi, Pathum Thani, Thailand, Thailand

Vol 11, No 2 (2024) [Incomplete Issue]

Qualitative Study(ies)

Accepted February 26, 2024

Published March 2, 2024

Downloads

PDF

Abstract
How to Cite
Metrics
References
License

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of team relationship differentiation on team creativity from the perspective of psychological safety of teams in China.

Methods: Qualitative research methods were used to conduct in-depth online and face-to-face interviews with respondents. The interviewees were 7 team leaders aged 23-43 years in the professional services, and retail and manufacturing sectors, which account for a large proportion of small and medium-sized enterprises ‎(SMEs). Data were collected by exploring the perspectives and experiences of the team leaders, analyzing the material in detail using content analysis, and then, managing and interpreting the data using NVivo ‎software.

Results: The results show that the effects of the differentiation of team relationships on team creativity are mainly reflected in two aspects: differentiation of exchange relationships between the leader and team member (leader-member exchange) and differentiation of relationships between team members. In particular, psychological safety in the team plays an important role as a bridge and mediator.

Conclusion: It can be concluded that with different psychological safety levels of teams, the difference in relationship strength between the difference in the relationship between superiors and subordinates and the difference in the relationship between team members, and the creativity of the team. If the impact of the differentiation of adjustment relationships on the team cannot be balanced, it will hinder the team's innovation activities and the improvement of team effectiveness, thus affecting the team's overall creativity.

1.

Jing L, Chienwattanasook K. Impact of Team Relationship Differentiation on Team Creativity: A Qualitative Research with Psychological Safety in the Team as a Mediator: Impact of team relationship differentiation on team creativity. Int J Body Mind Cult. 11(2).

Download Citation

Alge, B. J., Wiethoff, C., & Klein, H. J. (2003). When does the medium matter? Knowledge-building experiences and opportunities in decision-making teams. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process, 91(1), 26-37. doi:10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00524-1 [doi].

Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. J Pers Soc Psychol, 45(2), 357-376. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357 [doi].

Amabile, T. M., Hill, K. G., Hennessey, B. A., & Tighe, E. M. (1994). The Work Preference Inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(5), 950-967. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.5.950 [doi].

Amabile, T. M. (1997). Motivating creativity in organizations: On doing what you love and loving what you do. California Management Review, 40(1), 39-58. doi:10.2307/41165921 [doi].

Braun, S., Aydin, N., Frey, D., & Peus, C. (2018). Leader narcissism predicts malicious envy and supervisor-targeted counterproductive work behavior: Evidence from field and experimental research. J.Bus.Ethics, 151(3), 725-741. doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3224-5 [doi].

Brunetta, F., Marchegiani, L., & Peruffo, E. (2020). When birds of a feather don't flock together: Diversity and innovation outcomes in international R&D collaborations. J.Bus.Res., 114, 436-445. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.08.033 [doi].

Bryman, A. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done? Qual.Res., 6(1), 97-113. doi: 10.1177/1468794106058877 [doi].

Boies, K., & Howell, J. M. (2006). Leader–member exchange in teams: An examination of the interaction between relationship differentiation and mean LMX in explaining team-level outcomes. Leadersh. Q., 17(3), 246-257.

Cappelli, P. (2008). Talent management for the twenty-first century. Harvard Business Review, 86(3), 74.

Chen, X. P., He, W., & Weng, L. C. (2015). What is wrong with treating followers differently? the basis of leader-member exchange differentiation matters. J Manage, 44(3), 946-971. doi:10.1177/0149206315598372 [doi].

Ding, G., Liu, H., Huang, Q., & Gu, J. (2019). Enterprise social networking usage as a moderator of the relationship between work stressors and employee creativity: A multilevel study. Inf.Manag., 56(8), 103165. doi:10.1016/j.im.2019.04.008 [doi].

Ford, C. M. (1996). A theory of individual creative action in multiple social domains. Acad.Manage.Rev, 21(4), 1112-1142. doi:10.2307/259166 [doi].

Gajendran, R. S., & Joshi, A. (2012). Innovation in globally distributed teams: The role of LMX, communication frequency, and member influence on team decisions. J Appl Psychol, 97(6), 1252-1261. doi:2012-15951-001 [pii];10.1037/a0028958 [doi]. Retrieved from PM:22708920

Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. (1997). Meta-analytic review of leader-member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. J Appl Psychol, 82(6), 827-844. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.82.6.827 [doi].

Gooty, J., & Yammarino, F. J. (2013). The leader' member exchange relationship: A multisource, cross-level investigation. J.Manage, 42(4), 915-935. doi:10.1177/0149206313503009 [doi].

Graen, G., & Schiemann, W. (1978). Leader-member agreement: A vertical dyad linkage approach. J.Appl.Psychol., 63(2), 206-212. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.63.2.206 [doi].

Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadersh Q, 6(2), 219-247. doi:10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5 [doi].

Gu, Q., Wang, G., & Wang, L. (2013). Social capital and innovation in R&D teams: The mediating roles of psychological safety and learning from mistakes. R & D Management, 43(2), 89-102. doi:10.1111/radm.12002 [doi].

Hammond, M., Neff, N., Farr, J., Schwall, A., & Zhao, X. (2011). Predictors of Individual-Level Innovation at Work: A Meta-Analysis. Psychol.Aesthet.Creat.Arts, 5(1), 90-105. doi:10.1037/a0018556 [doi].

Henderson, D. J., Liden, R. C., Glibkowski, B. C., & Chaudhry, A. (2009). LMX differentiation: A multilevel review and examination of its antecedents and outcomes. Leadersh Q, 20(4), 517-534. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.04.003 [doi].

Henderson, D. J., Liden, R. C., Glibkowski, B. C., & Chaudhry, A. (2009). LMX differentiation: A multilevel review and examination of its antecedents and outcomes. Leadersh Q, 20(4), 517-534. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.10.002 [doi].

Hooper, D. T., & Martin, R. (2008). Beyond personal Leader' Member Exchange (LMX) quality: The effects of perceived LMX variability on employee reactions. Leadersh Q, 19(1), 20-30. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.12.002 [doi].

Ismail, N. Q. A., Hamzah, M., Kamarudin, N., Mustaffa, J., Zakaria, Z., & Noordin, N. (2012). Work unit context: The dyadic, team members relationships and group outcomes in a Malaysian Organization. Business Management Dynamics, 1(10), 22-32.

James, L., Demaree, R., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. J Appl Psychol, 69(1), 85-98. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.85 [doi].

Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological Conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Acad.Manage.J., 33(4), 692-724. doi:10.2307/256287 [doi].

Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2015). Advancing research on team process dynamics: Theoretical, methodological, and measurement considerations. Organ.Psychol.Rev., 5(4), 270-299. doi:10.1177/2041386614533586 [doi].

Liao, H., Liu, D., & Loi, R. (2010). Looking at both sides of the social exchange coin: a social cognitive perspective on the joint effects of relationship quality and differentiation on creativity. Acad.Manage.J., 53(5), 1090-1109. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.54533207 [doi].

Liden, R.C., Erdogan, B., Wayne, S.J. and Sparrowe, R.T. (2006), Leader-member exchange, differentiation, and task interdependence: implications for individual and group performance. J. Organiz. Behav., 27, 723-746. doi:10.1002/job.409 [doi].

Limna, P., Siripipatthanakul, S., & Phayaphrom, B. (2021). The role of big data analytics in influencing artificial intelligence (AI) adoption for coffee shops in Krabi, Thailand. International Journal of Behavioral Analytics, 1(2), 1-17.

Limna, P., Siripipatthanakul, S., Siripipattanakul, S., & Auttawechasakoon, P. (2022). Determinants of electronic word of mouth during the covid-19 pandemic in thailand: a qualitative case study of hostels at Aonang, Krabi in Thailand. Central Asian Journal of Innovations on Tourism Management and Finance, 3(4), 8-20.

Lin, X., Chen, Z. X., Tse, H. H. M., Wei, W., & Ma, C. (2019). Why and when employees like to speak up more under humble leaders? The Roles of personal sense of power and power distance. J Bus Ethics, 158(4), 937-950. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3704-2 [doi].

Liu, C., Liu, J., Chen, X., Li, Q., & Julie. (2020). Construction and discussion of superior and subordinate matching model in local organizational context. Human Resource Development in China, 37(3), 58-77.

Luqman, A., Talwar, S., Masood, A., & Dhir, A. (2021). Does enterprise social media use promote employee creativity and well-being? J.Bus.Res., 131, 40-54. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.03.051 [doi

Lv, J., Chen, W., & Ruan, Y. (2021). The impact of calling on employee creativity: evidence from internet companies. Front.Psychol, 12, 773667. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.773667 [doi]. Retrieved from PM:34899523

Ma, L., & Qu, Q. (2010). Differentiation in leader' member exchange: A hierarchical linear modeling approach. Leadersh Q, 21(5), 733-744. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.07.004 [doi].

Mehmood, M. S., Jian, Z., Akram, U., Akram, Z., & Tanveer, Y. (2022). Entrepreneurial leadership and team creativity: The roles of team psychological safety and knowledge sharing. Pers.Rev., 51(9), 2404-2425. doi:10.1108/PR-07-2020-0517 [doi].

Muñoz‐Doyague, M. F., & Nieto, M. (2012). Individual creativity performance and the quality of interpersonal relationships. Ind.Manag.Data Syst., 112(1), 125-145. doi:10.1108/02635571211193671/full/html [doi].

Naidoo, L. J., Scherbaum, C. A., Goldstein, H. W., & Graen, G. B. (2011). A longitudinal examination of the effects of lmx, ability, and differentiation on team performance. J Bus Psychol, 26(3), 347-357. doi:10.1007/s10869-010-9193-2 [doi].

Olaisen, J., & Revang, O. (2017). The dynamics of intellectual property rights for trust, knowledge sharing and innovation in project teams. Int J Inf Manage, 37(6), 583-589. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.05.012 [doi].

Pan, J., Wang, Z., Zhou, W., Miao, R., & Zhao, Y. (2017). The impact of LMX differentiation on creativity: A multilevel study. Journal of Management Science, 20(2), 108-126.

Pan, J., Zhou, X., & Zhou, W. (2010). Research on the relationship between leader-member exchange, perceived organizational support, psychological empowerment, and affective commitment. Applied Psychology(2), 167-172.

Rui, S., Jintao, S., & Zhang, T. (2009). Empirical study on the relationship between leadership member exchange, team member exchange, organizational innovation climate, and employee innovation behavior in Chinese enterprises. Journal of Management Engineering, (4), 109-115.

Seers, A. (1989). Team-member exchange quality: A new construct for role-making research. Organ.Behav.Hum.Decis.Process., 43(1), 118-135. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(89)90060-5 [doi].

Seers, A., Petty, M. M., & Cashman, J. F. (1995). Team-member exchange under team and traditional management: a naturally occurring quasi-experiment. Group Organ.Manag., 20(1), 18-38. doi:10.1177/1059601195201003 [doi].

Shalley, C. E., & Gilson, L. L. (2004). What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. Leadersh Q, 15(1), 33-53. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.004 [doi].

Shangen, L. S. L. (2011). Current status analysis and future prospects of team-member exchange research. Foreign Economics and Management, 33(7), 58-65.

Sherony, K. M., & Green, S. G. (2002). Coworker exchange: relationships between coworkers, leader-member exchange, and work attitudes. J Appl Psychol, 87(3), 542-548. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.542 [doi]. Retrieved from PM:12090611

Shin, S. J., & Zhou, J. (2007). When is educational specialization heterogeneity related to creativity in research and development teams? Transformational leadership as a moderator. J Appl Psychol, 92(6), 1709-1721. doi:2007-16921-018 [pii];10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1709 [doi]. Retrieved from PM:18020807

Siripipatthanakul, S., & Bhandar, M. (2021). A qualitative research factors affecting patient satisfaction and loyalty: A case study of smile family dental clinic. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development, 5(5), 877-896.

Tong-On, P., Siripipatthanakul, S., & Phayaphrom, B. (2021). The implementation of business intelligence using data analytics and its effects towards performance in hotel industry in Thailand. International Journal of Behavioral Analytics, 2(9), 1-17.

Wang, H., & Niu, X. (2004). Multidimensional structure of leader-member exchange and its impact on job performance and contextual performance. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 36(2), 179-185.

Wang, Z., & Zhong, L. F. (2011). Leader-member exchange differentiation: A review and agenda for future research. Advances in Psychological Science, 19(7), 1037.

Yan, Y., Zhou, E., Long, L., & Ji, Y. (2014). The influence of workplace ostracism on counterproductive work behavior: The mediating effect of state self-control. Social Behavior and Personality: An international journal, 42(6), 881-890.

Zhang, G. (2018). Subculture and its governance. Hebei Academic Journal, 6, 212-215.

Zhihua, D., Ding , Li Ping, ZhixinC, H., & Fengnian, L. (2005). Research on mathematical models of team creativity. Journal of Jiujiang University: Natural Science Edition, 20(3), 107-110.

Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Acad.Manage.J., 44(4), 682-696. doi:10.2307/3069410 [doi].

Impact of Team Relationship Differentiation on Team Creativity: A Qualitative Research with Psychological Safety in the Team as a Mediator