Health and Medical Psychology Health and Medical Humanities

Cervical Cancer Literacy and Screening Adherence among Female University Staff in Iraq: A Correlational Study

cervical cancer literacy health literacy screening adherence cross-sectional Iraq

Authors

  • Manar Mohammed Fadil
    manar.m@s.uokerbala.edu.iq
    Master of Nursing, Maternity Nursing, College of Nursing, University of Karbala, Iraq.
  • Sajidah S. Oleiwi Ph.D in Nursing Science, Maternity Nursing, College of Nursing, University of Karbala, Iraq.
Vol. 13 No. 1 (2026): January
Quantitative Study(ies)

Downloads

Objective: To examine the association between cervical cancer health literacy and adherence to preventive cervical cancer screening among female university staff in Karbala, Iraq.

Methods and Materials: A cross-sectional correlational study was conducted in January 2025 at the University of Karbala. Using simple random sampling from staff lists, 285 female employees (20–65 years) completed a structured questionnaire including: (1) an Arabic-translated and content-validated Cervical Cancer Awareness Measure (CCAM), and (2) an adherence-to-screening scale. Content validity was assessed by 17 experts; internal consistency was acceptable/excellent (Cronbach’s alpha reported in the manuscript). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson’s correlation, and simple linear regression (SPSS v26).

Findings: Most participants demonstrated high cervical cancer literacy (mean ≈ 37.46 ± 5.76; 64.2% high). Screening adherence was mostly moderate (mean ≈ 15.97 ± 3.11; 57.2% moderate; 22.1% low). Cervical cancer literacy showed a significant positive correlation with screening adherence (r ≈ 0.260, p < 0.01). In regression analysis, literacy significantly predicted adherence (β ≈ 0.260; p < 0.001), explaining about 6.8% of variance (R² ≈ 0.068)

Conclusion: Higher cervical cancer health literacy was associated with better screening adherence, yet adherence remained suboptimal despite generally high literacy. Multi-level, culturally tailored interventions beyond information provision—addressing barriers, motivation, and service access—are recommended to improve screening uptake.