Cultural, Social, and Community Psychology Health Humanities, Medical Humanities, and Arts-Based Health Studies

Cultural Memory, Identity, and Digital Transformation in Contemporary Kazakh Visual Art: A Psychocultural Analysis

Cultural Memory Cultural Identity Digital Art Postmodernism Psychocultural Analysis

Authors

  • Tolganay Bokesh
    bokesh.tolganay@proton.me
    Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Department of Cultural Studies, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
  • Bekzhan B. Meirbayev Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Department of Cultural Studies, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
  • Yildiz Tuna Ankara Haci Bayram University, Ankara, Turkey.
Vol. 13 No. 8 (2026): August
Qualitative Study(ies)

Downloads

Objective: This study aimed to examine the transformation of contemporary Kazakh visual art through a psychocultural perspective, focusing on cultural memory, identity representation, symbolic systems, digital mediation, and changing forms of viewer positioning.

Methods and Materials: A qualitative interpretive and multidisciplinary design was employed. The study combined visual analysis, semiotic interpretation, contextual cultural analysis, comparative art-historical analysis, and psychocultural interpretation. The corpus included more than 40 paintings, sculptures, conceptual installations, performances, mixed-media works, and digital artworks produced by selected Kazakh artists from three generational groups. Artworks were purposively selected based on their relevance to cultural memory, identity construction, symbolic representation, postmodern hybridity, technological mediation, and artist–viewer relationships. The analysis was organized around five dimensions: post-Soviet identity and cultural memory, postmodern hybridity, symbolic and archetypal representation, digital mediation, and viewer positioning.

Findings: The analysis revealed that contemporary Kazakh visual art has moved from predominantly representational and object-centered practices toward more hybrid, conceptual, and digitally mediated forms. Cultural symbols and historical references were not simply reproduced but were fragmented, reinterpreted, combined, and placed within new artistic contexts. Postmodern strategies included hybridity, quotation, fragmentation, symbolic layering, and reinterpretation of inherited visual codes. Digital and multimedia practices expanded artistic possibilities through video, animation, mixed media, interactive formats, and immersive environments. These developments also repositioned the viewer from passive observation toward interpretation, spatial engagement, and participation.

Conclusion:  Contemporary Kazakh visual art functions as a psychocultural space where cultural memory, identity, symbolic meaning, and technological transformation are continuously negotiated.